elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Ring, Lisa M. Ms.

candidate · H8GA01063
Ring, Lisa M. Ms. GA · DEM · House · GA-01 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Ring, Lisa M. Ms. · every race, every cycle

4 cycles1 committees4 contributing committees44 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2018

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Ring, Lisa M. Ms. (this candidate) challenger 4
Seidman, Barbara A challenger

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Carter, Earl Leroy incumbent 537

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

RICHMOND HILL, GA, 31324

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 97% · PACs 2% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)5465$195,098
PACs2$3,500
Super PACs1$2,700
Total (committee-sourced)$201,298

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

0% by dollars

0 of 1854 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 58% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 42%

1854 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 5468 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($280,782 vs $201,298). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · NEELEY, JESSICA

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
The Committee To Elect Lisa Ring, Llc Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2018:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $130,261 3,196 2018
Indivisible Action $2,700 1 2018
MacHinists Non Partisan Political League Of The International Association Of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers $1,000 1 2018
D.R.I.V.E. - Democrat, Republican, Independent Voter Education (The Pac Of The International Brotherhood Of Teamsters) $2,500 1 2018

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2018) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 3,196 of 3,199 contributions · 95% of dollars ($130,261).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$130,261

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 1 committee · 1 expenditure · $10  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue $1,767 60 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Ring, Grier $11,000 22 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Miller, Douglas $8,525 11 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Georgia Power $916 11 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Comcast $2,061 10 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Actblue $1,010 10
Google $402 9 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Mailchimp $945 6 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Niquette, Rory $135 5
Niquette, Andrew Robert $2,665 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Ethix Ventures Inc $2,952 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Hippo, Rory Austin $2,450 4 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)153
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)61
004 (Advertising)18
006 (Campaign materials)6
011 (Political contributions)1
007 (Campaign events)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..