elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Swisher, Carlton Aaron

candidate · H8ID02148
Swisher, Carlton Aaron ID · DEM · House · ID-02 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Swisher, Carlton Aaron · every race, every cycle

cycle 202220202018
3 cycles1 committees4 contributing committees37 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2018

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Swisher, Carlton Aaron (this candidate) challenger 4

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Simpson, Michael incumbent 402

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

BOISE, ID, 83703

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 77% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 23%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs4$11,000
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)1105$3,302
Total (committee-sourced)$14,302

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

0% by dollars

2 of 516 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 93% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 7%

516 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 1109 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($203,710 vs $14,302). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · STALLINGS, RICHARD HOWARD

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Swisher For Idaho Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2018:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $2,369 1,034 2018
Int'L Association Of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental And Reinforcing Iron Workers (Ipal) $1,000 1 2018
International Union Of Painters And Allied Trades Political Action Together Political Committee $5,000 1 2018
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Political Action Committee $2,000 1 2018

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2018) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 1,034 of 1,037 contributions · 23% of dollars ($2,369).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$2,369

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

1 of this candidate's 4 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Int'L Association Of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental And Reinforcing Iron Workers (Ipal) 83% / 17%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2018 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Facebook $5,224 30 004 (Advertising)
Sage Payment Solutions $3,087 13 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Goode, Joe $5,800 10 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Idaho State Democratic Party $11,024 9 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Paragon Solutions $1,513 7 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Printworks Company $2,647 7 006 (Campaign materials)
Ngp Van, Inc. $7,525 7 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Smith, Caleb $15,750 6 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Ngp Van, Inc. $9,600 6 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Us Postal Office $40 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Facebook $105 5 004 (Advertising)
Ngp Van, Inc. $900 3 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)75
004 (Advertising)47
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)28
006 (Campaign materials)23
007 (Campaign events)11
002 (Travel)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..