elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Markey, Edward Sen.

candidate · S4MA00028
Markey, Edward Sen. MA · DEM · Senate · MA · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Markey, Edward Sen. · every race, every cycle

10 cycles4 committees0 contributing committees0 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

1988

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Markey, Edward Sen. (this candidate) incumbent 190
Kennedy, Edward Moore Senator incumbent

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Malone, Joseph Daniel challenger

IND

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Griffel, David challenger

LIB

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Nason, Freda Lee challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

In the 1988 Senate field

MA

227 Senate candidates nationally in 1988.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Feingold, Russell Dana WI DEM $5,518,793
2 Hatch, Orrin G UT REP $1,820,858
3 Voinovich, George V OH REP $2,800
4 Sarbanes, Paul S MD DEM $0
5 Wallop, Malcolm WY REP
6 Engeleiter, Susan S WI REP
7 Press, Bill CA DEM
8 Blair, Thomas Lane MD REP

The national Senate field for 1988, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

BOSTON, MA, 02112

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 94% · PACs 6% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)202467$9,214,185
PACs302$546,227
Super PACs3$10,000
Total (committee-sourced)$9,770,412

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

35% by dollars

95202 of 140668 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 84% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 16%

140668 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 202772 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($52,671,831 vs $9,770,412). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · PATRICIA M CHISHOLM

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Markey Grassroots Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Markey Senate Victory Joint fundraising N
Markey For Senate Committee Principal campaign committee S
The Markey Committee Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 1988:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

31 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Academy Of Physician Associates Political Action Committee (Pa Pac) 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
T-Mobile Us, Inc. Political Action Committee (T-Pac) 51% / 49%
Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy Political Action Committee (Pt-Pac) 53% / 47%
Dell Technologies, Inc. Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
Lumen Technologies, Inc. Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
Argentum'S Silver Pac 54% / 46%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Political Action Committee (Bms Pac) 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 1988 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..