Elfreth, Sarah Kelly

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21403

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 79% · ● PACs 21% · ● Super PACs 0%

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

47% by dollars

3667 of 5145 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

● Individual (direct) 80% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 20%

5145 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 2918 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($3,588,402 vs $908,851). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

• $2,010,325 to vendors

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Treasurer · CHIEN, NADINE

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Contributing committees & PACs · 2024:

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

97% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2024) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 2,832 of 2,918 contributions · 79% of dollars ($717,482).

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

31 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Supporting: 3 committees · 34 expenditures · $4,356,838  ·  Opposing: 1 · 1 · $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

83% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..