elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Peters, Gary

candidate · S4MI00355
Peters, Gary MI · DEM · Senate · MI · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Peters, Gary · every race, every cycle

7 cycles4 committees14 contributing committees438 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2026 Senate field

MI

Peters, Gary ranks #4 of 117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary (this candidate) MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP.

Campaign contact

BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI, 48303

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 93% · PACs 7% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)1209849$39,710,698
PACs1605$2,802,148
Super PACs7$9,500
Party committees1$2,500
Total (committee-sourced)$42,524,847

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees56$1,140,340
Total$1,140,340

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

67% by dollars

410104 of 475672 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 68% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 32%

475672 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 1211462 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($89,116,567 vs $42,524,847). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · BUCKLES, GERALDINE

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Great Lakes Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Mvp Fund 2014 Joint fundraising N
Peters Senate Victory Joint fundraising N
Peters For Michigan Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

38 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Iheartmedia Inc. Pac 50% / 50%
Sazerac Company, Inc. Pac (Sazeracpac) 50% / 50%
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (Hiipac) 49% / 51%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Invesco Holding Company (Us), Inc. Employee Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Nafcu Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
Fmr Llc Political Action Committee - Federal (Fidelity Pac) 47% / 53%
Lumen Technologies, Inc. Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
Novartis Corporation Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
United States Postal Service $16,472 374
United States Postal Service (Usps) $5,485 203
United States Postal Service (Usps) $4,886 179
Actblue Technical Services $1,401,274 148
Actblue Technical Services $90,471 127
Actblue Technical Services $57,660 126
Actblue Technical Services $25,659 113
Stripe $3,223 105
Anne Lewis Strategies, Llc $2,399,992 53
Screen Strategies Media $35,383,682 51
Payroll Data Processing $1,174,143 50
At&T $5,370 48

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..