elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Cleaver, Emanuel II

candidate · H4MO05234
Cleaver, Emanuel II MO · DEM · House · MO-05 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Cleaver, Emanuel II · every race, every cycle

12 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees489 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2008

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Cleaver, Emanuel II (this candidate) incumbent 350

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Turk, Jacob challenger 1

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

KANSAS CITY, MO, 641336325

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 88% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 11% · Super PACs 1% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1534$2,906,356
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)4959$350,358
Super PACs26$28,500
Party committees2$31
Total (committee-sourced)$3,285,244

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees1$300
Total$300

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

15% by dollars

3204 of 11939 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 69% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 31%

11939 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 6521 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($7,164,276 vs $3,285,244). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · WASHINGTON, LUTHER

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Cleaver For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2008:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

36 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Council Of Life Insurers Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs Pac) 50% / 50%
Aflac Political Action Committee (Aflac Pac) 51% / 49%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
National Association Of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
Teachers Insurance Annuity Association Of America Pac (Tiaa Pac) 51% / 49%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) 48% / 52%
Transamerica Corporation Pac 48% / 52%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2008 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Uber Technologies $6,708 77
Verizon Wireless - Elgin $15,232 48
Verizon Wireless - Elgin $15,476 46
Aristotle - Washington $15,471 46
Verizon Wireless - Elgin $15,531 43
Powerful Performance Solutions, Llc $641,746 40
Commerce Bank $234 38
New Blue Interactive $100,382 37
Verizon Wireless - Elgin $10,153 37
Powerful Performance Solutions, Llc $732,587 33
New Blue Interactive $76,730 26
Storage Mart $10,310 25

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
007 (Campaign events)36

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..