elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Smith, Jason T

candidate · H4MO08162
Smith, Jason T MO · REP · House · MO-08 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Smith, Jason T · every race, every cycle

7 cycles2 committees1 contributing committees464 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2014

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Stocker, Barbara Hamill challenger

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Smith, Jason T (this candidate) incumbent 818

IND

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Hampton, Terry Lynn challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

SALEM, MO, 655608910

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 98% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 1% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs3066$6,530,487
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)534$59,560
Super PACs12$43,000
Total (committee-sourced)$6,633,047

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees44$1,117,715
Total$1,117,715

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

28% by dollars

5458 of 13808 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 61% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 39%

13808 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 3612 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($10,508,004 vs $6,633,047). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · BRANDOM, ELLEN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Smith Victory Joint fundraising N
Jason Smith For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2014:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

38 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Exelon Corporation Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Emergency Medicine Political Action Committee / American College Of Emergency Physicians 52% / 48%
The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Political Action Committee (Aotpac) 52% / 48%
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) 48% / 52%
Davita Inc. Political Action Committee (Dapac) 47% / 53%
New York Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee 47% / 53%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2014 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred $20,176 409 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Winred $311,307 292 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Winred $2,654 128 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot, Inc $14,209 111 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot, Inc $3,136 86 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Anedot, Inc $5,661 80 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot, Inc $2,310 66 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Fedex $1,821 60 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Democracy Engine Llc $11,545 59 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Begley, Young, Unterreiner And White $298,102 52 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Complete Campaigns $3,406 38 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Begley, Young, Unterreiner And White $235,756 37 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)2,862
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)786
004 (Advertising)239
002 (Travel)144
006 (Campaign materials)59
007 (Campaign events)54
012 (Donations)16
011 (Political contributions)4
005 (Polling)4

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..