elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Schmitt, Eric

candidate · S2MO00544
Schmitt, Eric MO · REP · Senate · MO · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Schmitt, Eric · every race, every cycle

cycle 202620242022
3 cycles2 committees81 contributing committees324 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2026 Senate field

MO

117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63122

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 70% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 27% · Party committees 3% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs476$1,246,649
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)519$474,749
Party committees2$51,200
Super PACs2$1,250
Total (committee-sourced)$1,773,848

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees23$582,398
Total$582,398

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

45% by dollars

5249 of 12579 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 85% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 15%

12579 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 999 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($10,384,180 vs $1,773,848). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · RUTLAND, JANNA

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Schmitt For Mo Senate Republican Nominee Fund 2022 Authorized committee S
Schmitt For Senate Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

30 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Elevance Health, Inc. Political Action Committee (Elevance Health Pac) 51% / 49%
Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Gridiron-Pac 52% / 48%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
Anheuser-Busch Companies Llc Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
Lumen Technologies, Inc. Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
The Cigna Group Employee Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
Toyota Motor North America, Inc Political Action Committee (Toyota/Lexus Pac) 46% / 54%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%
Chs/Community Health Systems, Inc. Political Action Cmte (Chs Pac) 45% / 55%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Pac 45% / 55%
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Federal Political Action Committee (State Farm Federal Pac) 44% / 56%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Win Red Technical Services $18,516 118
First Bankcard $111,687 50
Fulfillment Solutions Inc. $244,300 47
Onpoint Data Strategy Llc $22,839 32
Cmdi $28,118 26
Holloway Consulting, Inc. $64,180 25
Crosby Ottenhoff Group $134,001 21
Integram $65,406 21 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Axiom Strategies $131,314 19
Henryalan $32,485 19
Lilly & Company $29,593 18 002 (Travel)
Cmdi $23,373 18 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)140
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)136
004 (Advertising)123
002 (Travel)74
007 (Campaign events)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..