elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Kihuen, Ruben

candidate · H2NV00050
Kihuen, Ruben NV · DEM · House · NV-04 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Kihuen, Ruben · every race, every cycle

8 cycles2 committees0 contributing committees74 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2014

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Kihuen, Ruben (this candidate) incumbent 144
Horsford, Steven Alexzander challenger 649

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Hardy, Cresent challenger 57
Innis, Niger challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

LAS VEGAS, NV, 89125

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 69% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 30% · Party committees 1% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs204$327,906
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)3988$145,352
Party committees13$2,425
Super PACs1$1,000
Total (committee-sourced)$476,682

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees3$11,084
Total$11,084

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

37% by dollars

4529 of 7479 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 89% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 11%

7479 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 4206 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($3,941,046 vs $476,682). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · PETTERSON, JAY

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Silver State Victory 2016 Joint fundraising H
Ruben Kihuen For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2014:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

23 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Aflac Political Action Committee (Aflac Pac) 51% / 49%
Google Llc Netpac 49% / 51%
Teachers Insurance Annuity Association Of America Pac (Tiaa Pac) 51% / 49%
Day & Zimmermann Inc Federal Pac (Aka 'Daypac - Federal') 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Ncta - The Internet & Television Association Political Action Committee (Nctapac) 48% / 52%
Cox Enterprises Pac (Coxpac) Inc. 47% / 53%
Ernst & Young Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Holland & Knight Committee For Effective Government 46% / 54%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2014 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Adp, Inc. $23,921 78
Actblue Technical Services $5,684 55
First Data $4,068 43
Usps $1,070 28
At&T $3,905 25
Blue Wave Political Partners, Llc $5,790 24
Blue Wave Political Partners, Llc $21,750 24
Public Storage $3,160 24
Blue Wave Political Partners, Llc $6,338 21
Google, Inc. $735 21
Black, Eva $31,709 17
Blue State Digital $14,538 16

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..