elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Granger, Kay

candidate · H6TX12060
Granger, Kay TX · REP · House · TX-12 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Granger, Kay · every race, every cycle

16 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees313 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2010

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Smith, Tracey challenger

REP · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Granger, Kay (this candidate) incumbent 439
Brasovan, Michael Wayne challenger
Kelly, Matthew Edward challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

FORT WORTH, TX, 761076547

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 99% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 1% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1690$2,997,159
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)6604$22,302
Super PACs9$12,000
Total (committee-sourced)$3,031,461

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees6$323,438
Total$323,438

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

4% by dollars

1038 of 27717 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 88% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 12%

27717 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 8303 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($21,771,486 vs $3,031,461). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · OTTENHOFF, BENJAMIN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Kay Granger Campaign Fund Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2010:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Amazon.Com Services Llc Separate Segregated Fund (Amazon Pac) 50% / 50%
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (Hiipac) 49% / 51%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) 46% / 54%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
Employees Of Rtx Corporation Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
General Electric Company Aerospace Employee Political Action Committee (Ge Aerospace Pac) 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2010 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Anedot $13,913 131 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot $19,105 90 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Winred Technical Services Llc $1,367 79 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot $8,230 71 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Adp $4,787 57 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Shepheard, Hillary $133,878 45 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Winred Technical Services Llc $1,056 44 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Adp $3,884 44 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Aristotle International, Inc. $25,239 42 001 (Administrative / overhead)
At&T $8,221 38 001 (Administrative / overhead)
United States Treasury $40,183 38 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Capital One $156,044 34 012 (Donations)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,934
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)404
002 (Travel)55
011 (Political contributions)53
012 (Donations)35
004 (Advertising)14
005 (Polling)9
006 (Campaign materials)4
007 (Campaign events)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..