Person: Carter, John R Rep. · every race, every cycle
Raised — contributing committees / cycle
Spent — vendor payments / cycle
IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle
Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle
All four, combined -- 2016-2028
2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).
DEM · primary contest (7 filers, order not yet known)
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grimes, Michael Edward | challenger | — | 1 | ||||
| Hanke, Eric | challenger | — | 1 | ||||
| Holcomb, Murray A | challenger | — | 1 | ||||
| Imam, Donna | challenger | — | 7 | ||||
| Janjigian, Dan | challenger | — | 2 | ||||
| Mann, Christine Eady | challenger | — | 3 | ||||
| Young, Tammy | challenger | — | 2 |
REP · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter, John R Rep. (this candidate) | incumbent | — | 416 | ||||
| Wall, Christopher D | challenger | — | — | ||||
| Williams, Michael Howard Mr. | challenger | — | — |
Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.
WASHINGTON, TX, 205150001
Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).
Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.
● PACs 86% · ● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 14% · ● Super PACs 0%
| Source type | Contributions | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| PACs | 1364 | $2,276,497 |
| Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) | 27117 | $380,273 |
| Super PACs | 2 | $3,500 |
| Total (committee-sourced) | $2,660,271 |
Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.
| Payer type | Transfers | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Joint-fundraising committees | 16 | $256,355 |
| Total | $256,355 |
Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.
18% by dollars
4136 of 17417 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.
● Individual (direct) 83% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 17%
17417 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 28483 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($13,012,282 vs $2,660,271). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.
Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.
Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.
Treasurer · MEREDITH, D. TODD MR.
Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.
| Committee | Role | Type |
|---|---|---|
| John Carter For Congress | Principal campaign committee | H |
Contributing committees & PACs · 2020:
Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).
99% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2020) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 27,117 of 27,388 contributions · 46% of dollars ($380,273).
| Conduit | Amount |
|---|---|
| WinRed | $380,273 |
Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).
38 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.
| Committee / PAC | Overall giving | D / R |
|---|---|---|
| Honeywell International Political Action Committee | 50% / 50% | |
| National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee | 50% / 50% | |
| Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac | 49% / 51% | |
| Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (Hiipac) | 49% / 51% | |
| L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac | 51% / 49% | |
| Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz Pc Pac | 52% / 48% | |
| National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee | 48% / 52% | |
| American Society Of Anesthesiologists Political Action Committee (Asa Pac) | 47% / 53% | |
| American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) | 46% / 54% | |
| American Optometric Association Political Action Committee | 46% / 54% | |
| Employees Of Rtx Corporation Political Action Committee | 46% / 54% | |
| Leidos Inc. Political Action Committee | 46% / 54% |
Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).
Supporting: 4 committees · 15 expenditures · $88,135 · Opposing: 2 · 3 · $18,743
| Committee | Stance | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Civic | supports | $84,276 |
| Texas Alliance For Life Fed Pac | supports | $158 |
| Everytown For Gun Safety Victory Fund (Everytown Victory Fund) | opposes | $17,993 |
| National Right To Life Victory Fund | supports | $303 |
| Together We Thrive | opposes | $750 |
| National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund | supports | $3,398 |
Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).
4% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).
| Vendor | Paid | Payments | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream Communications | $74,391 | 98 | |
| Card Service Center - Independent Bank | $217,462 | 82 | |
| Card Service Center - Independent Bank | $208,717 | 77 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Card Service Center - Independent Bank | $245,032 | 71 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Card Service Center - Independent Bank | $173,277 | 70 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Hill Country Payroll | $123,269 | 63 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Hill Country Payroll | $112,233 | 63 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Hill Country Payroll | $166,151 | 48 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Hill Country Payroll | $117,217 | 42 | |
| Internal Revenue Service | $60,255 | 41 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Verizon Wireless | $17,667 | 41 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Piryx, Inc | $1,673 | 35 |
Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.
| Category | Payments |
|---|---|
| 001 (Administrative / overhead) | 1,106 |
| 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) | 278 |
| 004 (Advertising) | 176 |
| 006 (Campaign materials) | 16 |
| 005 (Polling) | 9 |
| 007 (Campaign events) | 4 |
Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.
No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.
Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.
One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..