elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Cornyn, John Sen

candidate · S2TX00106
Cornyn, John Sen TX · REP · Senate · TX · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Cornyn, John Sen · every race, every cycle

13 cycles9 committees0 contributing committees307 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2004 Senate field

TX

362 Senate candidates nationally in 2004.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
2 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
3 Wyden, Ronald L. OR DEM $7,587,737
4 Thune, John R. SD REP $5,702,727
5 Feingold, Russell Dana WI DEM $5,518,793
6 Crapo, Michael D ID REP $4,648,100
7 Kennedy, John Neely LA REP $3,952,042
8 Murkowski, Lisa AK REP $3,747,806

The national Senate field for 2004, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

AUSTIN, TX, 78711

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 73% · PACs 27% · Party committees 0% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)219588$10,087,157
PACs1568$3,737,944
Party committees1$44,600
Super PACs11$24,000
Total (committee-sourced)$13,893,701

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees63$6,590,377
Total$6,590,377

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

17% by dollars

208714 of 327272 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 87% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 13%

327272 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 221168 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($91,365,173 vs $13,893,701). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · CAMMACK, KERRY MR.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Friends Of John Cornyn Authorized committee S
Alabama Victory Committee Joint fundraising N
Cornyn Majority Committee Joint fundraising N
Cornyn Majority Committee; The Joint fundraising Q
Cornyn-Sessions Victory Committee Joint fundraising N
Cornyn-Texas Victory Committee Joint fundraising N
Cornyn Victory Committee Joint fundraising N
Texans For Senator John Cornyn Inc. Principal campaign committee S
Republican Party Of Texas Unauthorized / leadership PAC Y

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2004:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

38 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Medtronic Inc. Pac 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Cummins Inc. Political Action Committee (Cipac) 51% / 49%
Smith & Nephew, Inc. Pac (S+N Pac) 49% / 51%
The Procter & Gamble Company Good Government Fund 48% / 52%
Molina Healthcare, Inc. Pac 47% / 53%
Xcel Energy Employee Political Action Committee (Xpac) 47% / 53%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Political Action Committee (Bms Pac) 46% / 54%
Eli Lilly And Company Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Employees Of Rtx Corporation Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Morgan Stanley Political Action Committee 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2004 (2016 excluded).

Money to other candidates

redistribution · counts

This candidate's committees fund 3 other candidates across 1 state — 0% of those contributions go outside TX. 0.0% of receipts raised have been redistributed to other candidates.

CandidateStateContributions
Flores, Mayra Nohemi TX 1
Garcia, Cassandra TX 1
Hurd, William TX 1

Contributions from this candidate's own committees (principal + leadership / authorized) to other candidates, by count. Recipients are public candidates. Leadership-PAC linkage grows as committee↔candidate resolution improves.

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Fp1 Strategies Llc $144,557 123
Fp1 Strategies Llc $122,861 111
Winred $24,982 108
Winred $37,190 102
Winred $428,333 81
Stripe $117,451 75
Jackson, John $441,724 58
Davis, Spencer $93,536 46
Cmdi $187,447 44
Fls Connect Llc $664,589 43
Insperity $162,434 43
Fp1 Strategies Llc $15,442,208 42

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..