WASHINGTON, DC
CONSULT,001
Active cycles: 2024,2022
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Action | $24,000 | 24 | 2024 |
| Tech For Campaigns | $69,210 | 20 | 2024 |
| Trio Pac | $9,475 | 14 | 2024 |
| Tech For Campaigns | $36,098 | 12 | 2022 |
| Democratic Action | $11,500 | 12 | 2022 |
| Ivypac | $5,510 | 6 | 2022 |
| Ivypac | $6,000 | 6 | 2024 |
| New Engagement Pac | $1,950 | 3 | 2024 |
| 800Democrat | $1,000 | 1 | 2022 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie Llp | 4 | 53.0x |
| Elias Law Group | 5 | 32.8x |
| Amalgamated Bank | 3 | 11.1x |
| Actblue Technical Services | 5 | 3.7x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.