elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Leeds, Daniel

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

6 committees paid them6 payments

Active cycles: 2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
84.0%
top client · Dccc
92.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Dccc 84.0%
Scott For Congress 1.9%
Cal For Nc 6.7%
Jon Ossoff For Senate 6.7%
Tina Smith For Minnesota 0.8%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Dccc $32,500 1 2020
Scott For Congress $730 1 2018
Cal For Nc $2,580 1 2020
Jon Ossoff For Senate $2,580 1 2020
Tina Smith For Minnesota $310 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Leeds, Sunita 3 2449.6x
Woodsboro Bank 3 197.5x
Bumperactive 3 62.2x
Ngp Van, Inc. 3 25.5x
Actblue Technical Services 4 4.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.