elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Khanna, Rohit

candidate · H4CA12055
Khanna, Rohit CA · DEM · House · CA-17 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Khanna, Rohit · every race, every cycle

10 cycles2 committees11 contributing committees0 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2024

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Khanna, Rohit (this candidate) incumbent 30
Tandon, Ritesh challenger 5

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Chen, Anita S challenger 2

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

SANTA CLARA, CA, 95051

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 99% · PACs 1% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)112816$2,955,973
PACs68$16,445
Super PACs18$4,000
Total (committee-sourced)$2,976,418

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

14% by dollars

29586 of 57646 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 95% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 5%

57646 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 112902 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($60,390,686 vs $2,976,418). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · KHANNA, ROHIT

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Khanna For Congress Principal campaign committee H
Ro For Congress Inc Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2024:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $829,687 27,971 2024
Engineers Political Education Committee (Epec)/International Union Of Operating Engineers $0 4 2024
American Postal Workers Union Committee On Political Action $0 4 2024
National Association Of Letter Carriers Of U.S.A. Political Fund (Letter Carrier Political Fund) $-3,500 2 2024
Nea Fund For Children And Public Education $0 2 2024
Unite Here Tip Campaign Committee $0 2 2024
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. $0 2 2024
D.R.I.V.E. - Democrat, Republican, Independent Voter Education (The Pac Of The International Brotherhood Of Teamsters) $0 2 2024
Gridiron-Pac $2,500 1 2024
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Political Action Committee $-5,000 1 2024
National Association Of Chain Drug Stores, Inc. Political Action Committee $1,000 1 2024

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2024) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 27,971 of 27,992 contributions · 101% of dollars ($829,687).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$829,687

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

16 of this candidate's 30 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Cargill, Incorporated Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
Gridiron-Pac 52% / 48%
National Association Of Chain Drug Stores, Inc. Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Fraternity & Sorority Political Action Committee 45% / 55%
Chamber Of Digital Commerce Political Action Committee 44% / 56%
National Association Of Insurance And Financial Advisors Political Action Comm 43% / 57%
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative Political Action Committee 38% / 62%
National Rural Letter Carriers' Association Political Action Committee 64% / 36%
Engineers Political Education Committee (Epec)/International Union Of Operating Engineers 78% / 22%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 4 committees · 15 expenditures · $109,711  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Courage California Super Pac supports $66
South Bay Afl-Cio Labor Council supports $1,090
Protect Progress supports $108,546
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

4% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..