elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Himes, Jim

candidate · H8CT04172
Himes, Jim CT · DEM · House · CT-04 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Himes, Jim · every race, every cycle

10 cycles1 committees178 contributing committees394 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2020

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Himes, Jim (this candidate) incumbent 378

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Goldstein, Michael challenger 1
Riddle, Jonathan challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

FAIRFIELD, CT, 06824

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 65% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 35% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1862$3,279,854
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)19278$1,771,870
Super PACs7$13,000
Party committees4$56
Total (committee-sourced)$5,064,780

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

30% by dollars

13452 of 29561 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 83% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 17%

29561 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 21151 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($23,964,526 vs $5,064,780). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · WARNER, KATHLEEN DIGENNARO

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Himes For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2020:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $486,675 4,385 2020
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) $9,000 6 2020
The Boeing Company Political Action Committee $8,000 5 2020
United Parcel Service, Inc. Pac (Upspac) $7,500 5 2020
Morgan Stanley Political Action Committee $7,000 4 2020
Lockheed Martin Corporation Employees' Political Action Committee $6,000 4 2020
Honeywell International Political Action Committee $5,500 4 2020
Ball Corporation Political Action Committee $7,000 4 2020
The Vanguard Group Committee For Responsible Government $5,000 4 2020
Investment Company Institute Political Action Committee (Ici Pac) $2,500 4 2020
Depository Trust And Clearing Corporation Pac - Dtcc Pac; The $10,000 3 2020
The Council Of Insurance Agents & Brokers Political Action Committee $5,000 3 2020
National Association Of Benefits And Insurance Professionals Pac (Nabip Pac) $1,000 3 2020
General Dynamics Corporation Political Action Committee (General Dynamics Employee Pac) $2,500 3 2020
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Political Action Committee $3,000 3 2020
Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs Pac) $7,500 3 2020
Barclays Group Us Inc. Political Action Committee $3,500 3 2020
National Association Of Insurance And Financial Advisors Political Action Comm $10,000 3 2020
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. $5,000 3 2020
Caterpillar Inc. Political Action Committee (Catpac) $7,500 3 2020
Deloitte Political Action Committee $10,000 3 2020
American Association For Justice Political Action Committee (Aaj Pac) $4,000 3 2020
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) $6,000 3 2020
National Association Of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. Political Action Committee $7,500 3 2020
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Political Action Committee $5,000 3 2020

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

94% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2020) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 4,385 of 4,671 contributions · 49% of dollars ($486,675).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$486,675

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

39 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs Pac) 50% / 50%
Aflac Political Action Committee (Aflac Pac) 51% / 49%
National Association Of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
The Vanguard Group Committee For Responsible Government 49% / 51%
Ameriprise Financial Inc. Political Action Committee (Ameriprisepac) 48% / 52%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
The Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America Political Action Committee - Federal (Guardian Life P 52% / 48%
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) 48% / 52%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 2 committees · 3 expenditures · $70  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $60
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Paychex $247,461 190
Actblue Technical Services $8,963 111
Actblue Technical Services $28,237 105
Paychex $83,391 100
Paychex $128,714 94
Actblue Technical Services $16,046 73
First Data Merchant Services $17,140 70
Gusto $52,865 64
Paychex $73,333 59
Bank Of America $506 43
First Data Merchant Services $1,810 30
Next Level Partners $60,000 24

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..