elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Schatz, Brian

candidate · S4HI00136
Schatz, Brian HI · DEM · Senate · HI · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Schatz, Brian · every race, every cycle

7 cycles5 committees19 contributing committees140 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2016

DEM · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Schatz, Brian (this candidate) incumbent 384
Christensen, Paul Makani challenger
Inouye, Daniel K challenger

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Carroll, John Stanley challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

In the 2016 Senate field

HI

Schatz, Brian ranks #26 of 473 Senate candidates nationally in 2016.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
2 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
3 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
4 Bennet, Michael F. CO DEM $17,127,591
5 Duckworth, L. Tammy IL DEM $14,884,078
6 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
7 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
8 Harris, Kamala D CA DEM $11,824,890
26 Schatz, Brian (this candidate) HI DEM $3,692,722

The national Senate field for 2016, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP.

Campaign contact

HONOLULU, HI, 96812

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 54% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 45% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs733$1,351,765
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)22461$1,136,898
Super PACs10$20,000
Total (committee-sourced)$2,508,663

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees8$21,925
Total$21,925

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

25% by dollars

14657 of 27060 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 88% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 12%

27060 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 23204 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($17,952,646 vs $2,508,663). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · ZAMORE, JUDITH

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Alaska-Hawaii Victory Fund Joint fundraising S
Hawaii Michigan Victory Fund Joint fundraising S
Hawaii Senate Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Schatz Takai Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Schatz For Senate Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

33 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
American College Of Surgeons Professional Association Pac 49% / 51%
K&L Gates Llp Political Action Committee (Dc) 51% / 49%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
Samsung Electronics America Inc Political Action Committee 52% / 48%
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Llp Civic Action Committee (Aka Akin Gump Pac) 47% / 53%
American Land Title Association Title Industry Pac (Tipac) 47% / 53%
Davita Inc. Political Action Committee (Dapac) 47% / 53%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 1 committee · 1 expenditure · $10  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Amalgamated Bank $6,451 168
Adp, Inc $31,867 154
Adp, Inc $110,696 152
Amalgamated Bank $1,971 150
Actblue Technical Services $7,841 111
Actblue Technical Services $27,647 107
Adp, Inc $19,283 97
Amalgamated Bank $2,769 78
First Data Merchant Services $5,597 75
First Data Merchant Services $3,637 74
Actblue Technical Services $3,454 73
Shopify Inc. $147 62

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..