elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Kennedy, Joseph P III

candidate · H2MA04073
Kennedy, Joseph P III MA · DEM · Senate · MA · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Kennedy, Joseph P III · every race, every cycle

6 cycles2 committees16 contributing committees391 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2016 Senate field

MA

473 Senate candidates nationally in 2016.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
2 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
3 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
4 Bennet, Michael F. CO DEM $17,127,591
5 Duckworth, L. Tammy IL DEM $14,884,078
6 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
7 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
8 Harris, Kamala D CA DEM $11,824,890

The national Senate field for 2016, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

BOSTON, MA, 02137

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 89% · PACs 11% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)128930$6,461,627
PACs495$817,687
Super PACs7$13,500
Total (committee-sourced)$7,292,814

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees3$114,285
PACs1$2,500
Total$116,785

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

35% by dollars

29555 of 51434 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 85% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 15%

51434 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 129432 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($41,268,302 vs $7,292,814). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · LOWEY, KEITH D.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Kennedy For Massachusetts Principal campaign committee S
Joe Kennedy Victory Fund Joint fundraising N

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

32 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc. Political Action Committee (Otsuka Us Pac) 50% / 50%
Consumer Technology Association Pac 51% / 49%
K&L Gates Llp Political Action Committee (Dc) 51% / 49%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
Exelon Corporation Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
Ncta - The Internet & Television Association Political Action Committee (Nctapac) 48% / 52%
Abbott Laboratories Employee Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
American Hotel And Lodging Association Political Action Committee ('Hotelpac') 47% / 53%
Cox Enterprises Pac (Coxpac) Inc. 47% / 53%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 3 committees · 20 expenditures · $2,969,249  ·  Opposing: 1 · 5 · $7,261

CommitteeStanceAmount
New Leadership Pac supports $2,969,170
Rebellion Pac opposes $7,261
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10
Nea Advocacy Fund supports $68

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

29% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $55,333 98
Citizens Bank $2,007 86
Adp $9,538 78
First Bank Merchant Services $51,760 70
Grossman Marketing Group, Inc. $112,897 70
Citizens Bank $1,417 66
Actblue Technical Services $190,109 66
Curry-Ledbetter, Campbell $50,117 65
Kaufman, Emily M $27,983 65
4C Partners, Llc $187,507 62
Mandate Media $711,220 56
Paylocity $624,697 48

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)20

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..