elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Pressley, Ayanna

candidate · H8MA07032
Pressley, Ayanna MA · DEM · House · MA-07 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Pressley, Ayanna · every race, every cycle

5 cycles1 committees11 contributing committees299 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2020

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Pressley, Ayanna (this candidate) incumbent 40

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Campbell, Rayla challenger 1

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

DORCHESTER CENTER, MA, 02124

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 97% · PACs 3% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)166671$4,715,373
PACs62$140,050
Super PACs12$21,300
Total (committee-sourced)$4,876,723

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees25$291,080
Total$291,080

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

89% by dollars

35319 of 36347 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 58% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 42%

36347 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 166745 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($6,598,514 vs $4,876,723). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · WATSON, ROSLYN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
The Committee To Elect Ayanna Pressley Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2020:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $1,700,599 84,348 2020
Seiu Cope (Service Employees International Union Committee On Political Education) $5,000 4 2020
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee $-2,500 1 2020
American Council Of Life Insurers Political Action Committee $2,000 1 2020
Transport Workers Union Of America Political Contributions Committee $1,000 1 2020
International Union Of Painters And Allied Trades Political Action Together Political Committee $5,000 1 2020
MacHinists Non Partisan Political League Of The International Association Of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers $5,000 1 2020
Nea Fund For Children And Public Education $2,000 1 2020
American Postal Workers Union Committee On Political Action $2,500 1 2020
Ice Miller Pac $-2,500 1 2020
Chamber Of Digital Commerce Political Action Committee $50 1 2020

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2020) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 84,348 of 84,361 contributions · 99% of dollars ($1,700,599).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$1,700,599

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

12 of this candidate's 39 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Council Of Life Insurers Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
American Association Of Nurse Anesthetists Separate Segregated Fund (Crna-Pac) 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Optometric Association Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Barnes & Thornburg Political Action Committee 55% / 45%
Chamber Of Digital Commerce Political Action Committee 44% / 56%
Ice Miller Pac 40% / 60%
National Rural Letter Carriers' Association Political Action Committee 64% / 36%
Engineers Political Education Committee (Epec)/International Union Of Operating Engineers 78% / 22%
National Elevator Constructors Pac/ Intn'L Union Of Elevator Constructors (Nec Pac) 79% / 21%
International Association Of Firefighters Interested In Registration And Education Pac 82% / 18%
Int'L Association Of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental And Reinforcing Iron Workers (Ipal) 83% / 17%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 5 committees · 20 expenditures · $33,497  ·  Opposing: 2 · 8 · $5,899

CommitteeStanceAmount
The Collective Super Pac supports $10,000
Stars And Stripes Forever Pac opposes $1,511
United We Dream Action Pac supports $66
Congressional Leadership Fund opposes $4,388
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $60
Supermajority Pac supports $22,620
Together We Thrive supports $750

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

1% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Payroll Data Processing $598,689 146
Actblue Technical Services $45,545 117
Actblue Technical Services $42,031 115
Payroll Data Processing $395,175 113
Payroll Data Processing $490,691 108
Shopify $1,396 98
Actblue Technical Services $57,232 89
Actblue Technical Services $42,492 56 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Ngp Van, Inc. $87,137 51
Middle Seat $371,526 51
Middle Seat $302,653 50
Ngp Van, Inc. $131,908 48

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)326
004 (Advertising)59
002 (Travel)53
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)45
007 (Campaign events)13
005 (Polling)11
006 (Campaign materials)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..