elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Espy, Michael

candidate · S8MS00287
Espy, Michael MS · DEM · Senate · MS · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Espy, Michael · every race, every cycle

5 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees393 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Espy, Michael (this candidate) challenger 50

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Hyde-Smith, Cindy incumbent 480

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

In the 2026 Senate field

MS

117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

JACKSON, MS, 39236

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 98% · PACs 2% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0% · Other committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)514807$16,564,506
PACs92$297,425
Super PACs5$15,900
Party committees1$3,500
Other committees1$100
Total (committee-sourced)$16,881,431

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees10$222,234
Total$222,234

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

84% by dollars

49144 of 53710 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 51% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 49%

53710 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 514906 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($17,490,186 vs $16,881,431). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · BROWN, KAISER

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Mike Espy For Senate Campaign Committee Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

3 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Service Corporation International Pac 49% / 51%
North America'S Building Trades Unions Political Educational Fund 63% / 37%
National Association Of Letter Carriers Of U.S.A. Political Fund (Letter Carrier Political Fund) 78% / 22%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $429,483 101
Bankplus $2,279 83
Adp Payroll $631,111 80
Regions Bank $1,693 67
Actblue Technical Services $215,166 65 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Google.Com $6,106 52
Authentic Campaigns $639,812 42
Delta Airlines $18,693 37
Chevron $1,295 31
Tatango $10,754 30
Mvar Media $1,967,693 29
Google.Com $3,012 25

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)65
006 (Campaign materials)26
001 (Administrative / overhead)14
007 (Campaign events)4
005 (Polling)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..