elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Price, David

candidate · H6NC04037
Price, David NC · DEM · House · NC-04 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Price, David · every race, every cycle

21 cycles3 committees0 contributing committees173 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2010

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Price, David (this candidate) incumbent 176

REP · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Burnett, David Wayne challenger
Lawson, William T Mr. Jr. challenger
Roche, Frank challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

RALEIGH, NC, 27602

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 89% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 11% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs508$863,402
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)2485$104,102
Super PACs3$3,500
Party committees1$42
Total (committee-sourced)$971,046

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

1% by dollars

186 of 22367 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 91% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 9%

22367 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 2997 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($10,176,560 vs $971,046). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · AUMAN, ROSE

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Democratic Unity Committee Joint fundraising H
Fourth District Unity Campaign Committee Joint fundraising H
Price For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2010:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

28 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Basf Corporation Employees Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) 46% / 54%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
Employees Of Rtx Corporation Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
General Electric Company Aerospace Employee Political Action Committee (Ge Aerospace Pac) 46% / 54%
Leidos Inc. Political Action Committee 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2010 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Paychex Inc. $78,842 77 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Paychex Inc. $216,621 76 001 (Administrative / overhead)
First Data Merchant Services $6,477 74 001 (Administrative / overhead)
First Data Merchant Services $2,404 63 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Paychex Inc. $149,438 61 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Actblue Technical Services $650 52 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Actblue Technical Services $2,345 51 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Verizon Wireless $5,636 46 001 (Administrative / overhead)
First Data Merchant Services $7,018 45 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Verizon Wireless $6,203 45 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Pnc Bank $1,394 34 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Pnc Bank $702 30 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,205
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)257
004 (Advertising)17
007 (Campaign events)15
012 (Donations)14
006 (Campaign materials)10
002 (Travel)4
011 (Political contributions)1
005 (Polling)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..