elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Menendez, Robert

candidate · S6NJ00289
Menendez, Robert NJ · IND · Senate · NJ · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Menendez, Robert · every race, every cycle

11 cycles6 committees18 contributing committees271 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2016 Senate field

NJ

473 Senate candidates nationally in 2016.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
2 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
3 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
4 Bennet, Michael F. CO DEM $17,127,591
5 Duckworth, L. Tammy IL DEM $14,884,078
6 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
7 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
8 Harris, Kamala D CA DEM $11,824,890

The national Senate field for 2016, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

NEWARK, NJ, 07102

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 68% · PACs 32% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)26450$6,954,310
PACs1888$3,236,875
Super PACs14$32,850
Party committees1$5,000
Total (committee-sourced)$10,229,035

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees29$2,281,702
Total$2,281,702

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

21% by dollars

20661 of 91332 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 90% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 10%

91332 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 28353 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($93,617,356 vs $10,229,035). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · PALUMBO, JOHN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Menendez Senate Victory 2012 Joint fundraising N
Menendez Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Nelson-Menendez Victory Fund Joint fundraising S
New Jersey Democratic Victory Joint fundraising Q
New Jersey Senate 2006 Joint fundraising Y
Menendez For Senate Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Novo Nordisk Inc. Pac (Novo Nordisk Pac) 50% / 50%
Abbvie Political Action Committee 51% / 49%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
National Association Of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Biotechnology Innovation Organization Pac (Bio Pac) 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) 48% / 52%
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Llp Civic Action Committee (Aka Akin Gump Pac) 47% / 53%
American Hotel And Lodging Association Political Action Committee ('Hotelpac') 47% / 53%
Fmr Llc Political Action Committee - Federal (Fidelity Pac) 47% / 53%
Novartis Corporation Political Action Committee 53% / 47%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 7 committees · 15 expenditures · $982,721  ·  Opposing: 3 · 48 · $6,883,370

CommitteeStanceAmount
Integrity Nj opposes $6,714,163
Committee To Build The Economy supports $715,850
Leadership Alliance supports $240,000
Unidosus Action Fund, Inc. supports $16,250
Citizens For A Stronger New Jersey opposes $11,275
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $36
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10
Americas Pac opposes $157,932
Protecting Our Vote Pac supports $10,500
Ripple Of Hope Pac Inc supports $75

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

43% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $108,619 114
Actblue Technical Services $46,808 76
Actblue Technical Services $21,937 72
First Data Merchant Services $11,629 37
Chase Card Services $140,722 36
Td Bank $688 35
Paychex $46,847 32
Chase Card Services $39,917 29
Actblue Technical Services $36,949 25
Cfo Compliance, Llc $54,504 24
Harta Communications $107,005 24
Glh Consulting, Inc. $91,048 24

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)122
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..