elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Lujan, Ben R Mr.

candidate · H8NM03196
Lujan, Ben R Mr. NM · DEM · House · NM-03 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Lujan, Ben R Mr. · every race, every cycle

10 cycles2 committees17 contributing committees337 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2016

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Lujan, Ben R Mr. (this candidate) incumbent 333

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Lucero, Michael Glenn challenger
Romero, Michael H challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

SANTA FE, NM, 87506

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 78% · PACs 22% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)206998$4,964,640
PACs701$1,427,329
Super PACs4$10,500
Party committees10$535
Total (committee-sourced)$6,403,004

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees18$202,752
Total$202,752

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

59% by dollars

135494 of 144056 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 75% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 25%

144056 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 207713 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($19,585,553 vs $6,403,004). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · DENISH, DIANE

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
People For Ben Principal campaign committee S
Lujan/Lobo Victory Fund Joint fundraising N

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

32 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Sazerac Company, Inc. Pac (Sazeracpac) 50% / 50%
Elevance Health, Inc. Political Action Committee (Elevance Health Pac) 51% / 49%
Humana Inc. Political Action Committee 51% / 49%
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (Hiipac) 49% / 51%
International Council Of Shopping Centers Inc Political Action Committee (Icsc Pac) 49% / 51%
T-Mobile Us, Inc. Political Action Committee (T-Pac) 51% / 49%
Intel Corporation Political Action Committee (Ipac) 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
Ncta - The Internet & Television Association Political Action Committee (Nctapac) 48% / 52%
American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy Political Action Committee (Pt-Pac) 53% / 47%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 4 committees · 4 expenditures · $25,590  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10
Nea Advocacy Fund supports $68
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
American College Of Radiology Association Pac supports $25,502

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $161,026 136
Actblue Technical Services $35,469 118
Actblue Technical Services $32,576 111
Actblue Technical Services $8,450 106
United States Postal Service $2,224 69
Payroll Data Processing $810,946 65
Numero Inc. $5,234 51
Amalgamated Bank $2,674 51
Verizon Wireless $7,831 49
Numero, Inc. $2,171 49
Amalgamated Bank $2,387 48
Democracy Engine Llc $4,060 40

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..