elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Cunningham, Joe

candidate · H8SC01116
Cunningham, Joe SC · DEM · House · SC-01 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Cunningham, Joe · every race, every cycle

cycle 202220202018
3 cycles1 committees5 contributing committees198 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2022

DEM · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Cunningham, Joe (this candidate) incumbent 30
Andrews, Annie Dr. challenger 3
Cingolani, Rebecca Niess challenger 1

REP · primary contest (4 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Arrington, Katie challenger
Centurion, Ingrid challenger
MacE, Nancy incumbent 397
Piper-Loomis, Lynz challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

CHARLESTON, SC, 29413

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 100% · PACs 0% · Party committees 0% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)87043$6,497,655
PACs45$5,050
Party committees10$5,000
Super PACs2$0
Total (committee-sourced)$6,507,705

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees8$119,668
Total$119,668

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

81% by dollars

44164 of 47531 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 69% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 31%

47531 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 87100 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($14,713,872 vs $6,507,705). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · JONES, TYLER

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Joe Cunningham For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $3,602 7 2022
International Association Of Firefighters Interested In Registration And Education Pac $-5,000 1 2022
American Postal Workers Union Committee On Political Action $-2,500 1 2022
The Farm Credit Council Political Action Committee $-1,000 1 2022
American Chemistry Council Pac $-1,000 1 2022

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

64% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2022) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 7 of 11 contributions · -61% of dollars ($3,602).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$3,602

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

8 of this candidate's 30 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Chamber Of Digital Commerce Political Action Committee 44% / 56%
American Chemistry Council Pac 37% / 63%
The Farm Credit Council Political Action Committee 34% / 66%
National Association Of Letter Carriers Of U.S.A. Political Fund (Letter Carrier Political Fund) 78% / 22%
National Restaurant Association Pac (Restaurant Pac) 21% / 79%
Carpenters Legislative Improvement Committee United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners 81% / 19%
International Association Of Firefighters Interested In Registration And Education Pac 82% / 18%
United Mine Workers Of America - Coal Miners Political Action Committee 83% / 17%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 1 committee · 1 expenditure · $9  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $9

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $142,598 210
Paychex Of New York Llc $354,583 117
Actblue Technical Services $63,712 110
United States Postal Service $10,665 104
Uber $1,429 101
United States Postal Service $7,402 90
Paychex Of New York Llc $167,413 63
Democracy Engine $6,127 62
First Data Merchant Services $2,679 48
Gmmb $5,313,702 43
New Blue Interactive $214,290 39
Google $11,845 36

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..