elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Ramirez, Ruben

candidate · H2TX15138
Ramirez, Ruben TX · DEM · House · TX-15 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Ramirez, Ruben · every race, every cycle

cycle 2022
1 cycles1 committees7 contributing committees32 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2022

DEM · primary contest (6 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Ramirez, Ruben (this candidate) challenger 7
Alvarado, Eliza Dr. challenger 1
Haddad, Roberto Adrian challenger
Melendez, Ivan Dr. challenger 1
Vallejo, Michelle challenger 28
Villarreal Rigney, John challenger 1

REP · primary contest (5 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Canady, Sara Larue Newnam challenger
Cavazos, Jose Aizar challenger
De La Cruz, Monica challenger 391
Garza, Mauro Everett Mr. challenger
Krause, Ryan Patrick challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

EDINBURG, TX, 78539

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 86% · PACs 14%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)554$157,018
PACs7$26,000
Total (committee-sourced)$183,018

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

36% by dollars

320 of 648 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 82% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 18%

648 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 561 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($828,560 vs $183,018). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · MAY, JENNIFER

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Ruben Ramirez For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $157,018 554 2022
Fighting For South Texas Pac $5,000 2 2022
The Williams Companies, Inc. Political Action Committee $1,000 1 2022
With Honor Pac $5,000 1 2022
Serve America Pac $5,000 1 2022
International Association Of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail And Transportation Workers Political Action League $5,000 1 2022
Ua Union Plumbers & Pipefitters Vote! Pac (United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Of The United States And Canada) $5,000 1 2022

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

99% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2022) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 554 of 561 contributions · 86% of dollars ($157,018).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$157,018

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

2 of this candidate's 7 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
With Honor Pac 56% / 44%
The Williams Companies, Inc. Political Action Committee 18% / 82%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 1 committee · 5 expenditures · $492,043  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Dmfi Pac supports $492,043

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

73% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $6,203 51
Gusto $64,134 35
Facebook $2,359 28
Bergmann Zwerdling Direct $178,680 14
Democracy Engine, Llc $8,431 13
Ngp Van $5,676 12
Usps $689 8
Lowes $2,500 8
Martinez, Marsha $4,350 8
Next Level Partners $18,414 7
Bumperactive $1,068 5
Gomez, Bernardo $12,052 5

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..