elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Williams, Roger

candidate · H2TX33040
Williams, Roger TX · REP · House · TX-25 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Williams, Roger · every race, every cycle

8 cycles3 committees0 contributing committees255 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2012

REP · primary contest (11 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Williams, Roger (this candidate) incumbent 325
Beltz, Ernie Alan Jr. challenger
Burch, William (Bill)Paul challenger
Campbell, Donna Dr. challenger
Costa, Dianne Salvagno challenger
Garrison, David Henry challenger
Hewlett, Jack Justin challenger
Matthews, Brian challenger
Riddle, Wesley Allen challenger
Wilbanks, Chad challenger
Williams, Michael L challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

CLEBURNE, TX, 76031

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 89% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 9% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1064$2,072,350
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)849$211,907
Super PACs11$34,000
Total (committee-sourced)$2,318,257

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees103$2,962,162
Total$2,962,162

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

10% by dollars

1372 of 11060 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 84% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 16%

11060 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 1924 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($12,335,920 vs $2,318,257). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · FARMER, GARY S.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Canseco-Williams Victory Committee Joint fundraising H
Roger Williams Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Roger Williams For U S Congress Committee Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2012:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Wells Fargo And Company Employees Good Government Federal Fund II 48% / 52%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
American Optometric Association Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Ernst & Young Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Toyota Motor North America, Inc Political Action Committee (Toyota/Lexus Pac) 46% / 54%
Ally Financial Inc. Advocacy Political Action Committee 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2012 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred Technical Services Llc $10,421 90
Winred Technical Services Llc $5,082 62
Winred Technical Services Llc $12,343 44
Capitol Hill Club $13,300 43
Go Big Media, Inc. $2,140,513 34
Irs $65,840 29
Irs $53,444 28
E-Onlinedata $2,820 27
High Water Strategies, Inc. $204,810 27
Politicoin $73,655 27
Eftps $40,853 26
Rightside Compliance $42,855 25

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..