elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Denham, Jeff

candidate · H0CA19173
Denham, Jeff CA · REP · House · CA-10 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Denham, Jeff · every race, every cycle

9 cycles9 committees0 contributing committees132 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Desaulnier, Mark incumbent 159

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Denham, Jeff (this candidate) challenger 473

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

TURLOCK, CA, 95382

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 99% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs989$1,967,919
Super PACs11$27,500
Total (committee-sourced)$1,995,419

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees12$225,869
Total$225,869

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

0% by dollars

0 of 12411 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 86% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 14%

12411 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 1000 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($11,850,328 vs $1,995,419). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · BAUER, DAVID

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
America'S New Majority Joint fundraising N
California Retention Fund Joint fundraising N
Denham Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
(Freshman Hold'Em Jfc) Freshman Hold'Em, Stutzman For Congress, Tom Reed For Congress, Denham For Congress, Benishek For Congress, Inc., Rodney For Congress, Duffy For Congres, Chris Gibson For... Joint fundraising N
Patriot Day I Joint fundraising H
Patriot Day II 2011 Joint fundraising H
Rcp Victory Fund Revitalizing California Prosperity Joint fundraising H
Security For America Fund III Joint fundraising H
Denham For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Consumer Technology Association Pac 51% / 49%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
Siemens Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
United Airlines, Inc. Political Action Committee (Uapac) 49% / 51%
Saltchuk Resources, Inc. Pac 52% / 48%
American Society Of Anesthesiologists Political Action Committee (Asa Pac) 47% / 53%
National Multifamily Housing Council Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) 46% / 54%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
General Electric Company Aerospace Employee Political Action Committee (Ge Aerospace Pac) 46% / 54%
Walmart Inc. Pac For Responsible Government 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Stripe $24,209 486 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Efundraising Connections $8,977 62 001 (Administrative / overhead)
The Monaco Group $570,945 39 004 (Advertising)
Wendy Warfield & Assoc. $40,139 27 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Chase Card Services $142,968 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
At&T Mobility $10,359 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)
At&T Mobility $5,460 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)
At&T Mobility $5,209 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Bauer, David $6,117 23 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Bauer, David $35,426 22 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Fp1 Digital, Llc $149,338 21 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Bauer, David $13,821 20 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,050
002 (Travel)582
004 (Advertising)238
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)145
011 (Political contributions)10
005 (Polling)8

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..