elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Veasey, Marc Allison

candidate · H2TX33073
Veasey, Marc Allison TX · DEM · House · TX-33 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Veasey, Marc Allison · every race, every cycle

8 cycles1 committees16 contributing committees471 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2016

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Veasey, Marc Allison (this candidate) incumbent 475

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Chadwick, Howard Bruce challenger
Mitchell, Monte Mark challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

FORT WORTH, TX, 76105

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 78% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 21% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs2189$3,697,325
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)2031$999,033
Super PACs9$13,500
Party committees5$4,045
Total (committee-sourced)$4,713,902

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
PACs2$1,500
Total$1,500

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

35% by dollars

3290 of 9700 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 65% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 35%

9700 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 4234 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($8,572,328 vs $4,713,902). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · LANGHAM, CHARLES G. DR. III

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Marc Veasey Congressional Campaign Committee Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs Pac) 50% / 50%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Charter Communications Inc. Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
General Motors Company Political Action Committee (Gm Pac) 53% / 47%
Molina Healthcare, Inc. Pac 47% / 53%
New York Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) 46% / 54%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
Eli Lilly And Company Political Action Committee 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 9 committees · 22 expenditures · $87,416  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
National Association Of Realtors Congressional Fund supports $70,072
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $182
Direct Selling Empowers Americans supports $16,240
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Nea Advocacy Fund supports $68
Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes supports $7
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $36
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $9
Together We Thrive supports $750
Human Rights Campaign Pac supports $22
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

2% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Uber Technologies, Inc. $1,538 58
Quiktrip $1,522 58 001 (Administrative / overhead)
At&T $9,617 48
Intuit $5,961 48
Actblue Technical Services $9,454 48 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Adobe Systems Incorporated $1,553 39
Actblue Technical Services $4,598 36
Google Inc. $1,233 35 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Uber Technologies, Inc. $560 33 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Ngp Van $37,256 29
First Data Merchant Services $3,089 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Mrm Strategies $112,946 26

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,095
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)248
002 (Travel)210
007 (Campaign events)181
004 (Advertising)97
006 (Campaign materials)49
012 (Donations)16
011 (Political contributions)5

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..