Person: Veasey, Marc Allison · every race, every cycle
Raised — contributing committees / cycle
Spent — vendor payments / cycle
IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle
Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle
All four, combined -- 2016-2028
2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veasey, Marc Allison (this candidate) | incumbent | — | 475 |
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MacGlaflin, Robert James | challenger | — | — |
Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.
FORT WORTH, TX, 76105
Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).
Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.
● PACs 78% · ● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 21% · ● Super PACs 0% · ● Party committees 0%
| Source type | Contributions | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| PACs | 2189 | $3,697,325 |
| Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) | 2031 | $999,033 |
| Super PACs | 9 | $13,500 |
| Party committees | 5 | $4,045 |
| Total (committee-sourced) | $4,713,902 |
Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.
| Payer type | Transfers | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| PACs | 2 | $1,500 |
| Total | $1,500 |
Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.
35% by dollars
3290 of 9700 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.
● Individual (direct) 65% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 35%
9700 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 4234 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($8,572,328 vs $4,713,902). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.
Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.
Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.
Treasurer · LANGHAM, CHARLES G. DR. III
Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.
| Committee | Role | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Veasey Congressional Campaign Committee | Principal campaign committee | H |
Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:
Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).
58% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2022) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 856 of 1,488 contributions · 27% of dollars ($407,791).
| Conduit | Amount |
|---|---|
| ActBlue | $407,791 |
Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).
37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.
| Committee / PAC | Overall giving | D / R |
|---|---|---|
| Honeywell International Political Action Committee | 50% / 50% | |
| National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee | 50% / 50% | |
| Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs Pac) | 50% / 50% | |
| Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac | 49% / 51% | |
| National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee | 48% / 52% | |
| Charter Communications Inc. Political Action Committee | 47% / 53% | |
| General Motors Company Political Action Committee (Gm Pac) | 53% / 47% | |
| Molina Healthcare, Inc. Pac | 47% / 53% | |
| New York Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee | 47% / 53% | |
| American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) | 46% / 54% | |
| American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) | 46% / 54% | |
| Eli Lilly And Company Political Action Committee | 46% / 54% |
Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).
Supporting: 4 committees · 4 expenditures · $47 · Opposing: 0 · 0 · —
| Committee | Stance | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes | supports | $7 |
| Planned Parenthood Votes | supports | $9 |
| Sierra Club Independent Action | supports | $10 |
| Human Rights Campaign Pac | supports | $22 |
Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).
0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).
| Vendor | Paid | Payments | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uber Technologies, Inc. | $1,538 | 58 | |
| Quiktrip | $1,522 | 58 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| At&T | $9,617 | 48 | |
| Intuit | $5,961 | 48 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $9,454 | 48 | 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) |
| Adobe Systems Incorporated | $1,553 | 39 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $4,598 | 36 | |
| Google Inc. | $1,233 | 35 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Uber Technologies, Inc. | $560 | 33 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Ngp Van | $37,256 | 29 | |
| First Data Merchant Services | $3,089 | 26 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Mrm Strategies | $112,946 | 26 |
Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.
| Category | Payments |
|---|---|
| 001 (Administrative / overhead) | 1,095 |
| 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) | 248 |
| 002 (Travel) | 210 |
| 007 (Campaign events) | 181 |
| 004 (Advertising) | 97 |
| 006 (Campaign materials) | 49 |
| 012 (Donations) | 16 |
| 011 (Political contributions) | 5 |
Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.
No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.
Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.
One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..