elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Pocan, Mark

candidate · H2WI02124
Pocan, Mark WI · DEM · House · WI-02 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Pocan, Mark · every race, every cycle

8 cycles1 committees16 contributing committees366 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2016

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Pocan, Mark (this candidate) incumbent 206

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Theron, Daniel Peter challenger 2

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

MADISON, WI, 53701

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 56% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 42% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs893$1,696,934
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)81272$1,280,952
Super PACs20$43,500
Total (committee-sourced)$3,021,386

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

42% by dollars

19256 of 24758 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 59% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 41%

24758 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 82185 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($4,336,962 vs $3,021,386). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · POPE, SONDY

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Mark Pocan For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

25 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
American Academy Of Dermatology Association Political Action Committee (Skinpac) 51% / 49%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
American Association Of Nurse Anesthetists Separate Segregated Fund (Crna-Pac) 48% / 52%
American Veterinary Medical Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Emergency Medicine Political Action Committee / American College Of Emergency Physicians 52% / 48%
American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy Political Action Committee (Pt-Pac) 53% / 47%
Foley & Lardner Political Fund, Inc. 53% / 47%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee 54% / 46%
American Optometric Association Political Action Committee 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 9 committees · 18 expenditures · $2,072  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
350 Wisconsin Action supports $507
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $60
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Moveon.Org Political Action supports $126
Aft Solidarity supports $500
Together We Thrive supports $750
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Nea Advocacy Fund supports $68
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $9
Human Rights Campaign Pac supports $12
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Uw Credit Union $1,770 117
Actblue Technical Services $14,637 116
Actblue Technical Services $11,147 111
Uw Credit Union $1,650 110
Actblue Technical Services $7,590 107
Usps $3,842 86
Actblue Technical Services $15,316 75 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Usps $4,960 50
Uber Technologies $1,230 46
Gusto $12,342 40
Usps $3,815 35
Usps $4,566 28

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)83

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..