Person: Pocan, Mark · every race, every cycle
Raised — contributing committees / cycle
Spent — vendor payments / cycle
IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle
Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle
All four, combined -- 2016-2028
2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).
MADISON, WI, 53701
Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).
Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.
● PACs 56% · ● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 42% · ● Super PACs 1%
| Source type | Contributions | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| PACs | 893 | $1,696,934 |
| Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) | 81272 | $1,280,952 |
| Super PACs | 20 | $43,500 |
| Total (committee-sourced) | $3,021,386 |
Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.
42% by dollars
19256 of 24758 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.
● Individual (direct) 59% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 41%
24758 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 82185 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($4,336,962 vs $3,021,386). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.
Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.
Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.
Treasurer · POPE, SONDY
Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.
| Committee | Role | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Pocan For Congress | Principal campaign committee | H |
Contributing committees & PACs · 2018:
Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).
97% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2018) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 11,143 of 11,517 contributions · 26% of dollars ($207,379).
| Conduit | Amount |
|---|---|
| ActBlue | $207,379 |
Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).
25 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.
Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).
Supporting: 2 committees · 2 expenditures · $78 · Opposing: 0 · 0 · —
| Committee | Stance | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Nea Advocacy Fund | supports | $68 |
| Sierra Club Political Committee | supports | $10 |
Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).
0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).
| Vendor | Paid | Payments | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uw Credit Union | $1,770 | 117 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $14,637 | 116 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $11,147 | 111 | |
| Uw Credit Union | $1,650 | 110 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $7,590 | 107 | |
| Usps | $3,842 | 86 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $15,316 | 75 | 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) |
| Usps | $4,960 | 50 | |
| Uber Technologies | $1,230 | 46 | |
| Gusto | $12,342 | 40 | |
| Usps | $3,815 | 35 | |
| Usps | $4,566 | 28 |
Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.
| Category | Payments |
|---|---|
| 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) | 83 |
Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.
No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.
Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.
One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..