elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Lipinski, Daniel William William

candidate · H4IL03077
Lipinski, Daniel William William IL · DEM · House · IL-03 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Lipinski, Daniel William William · every race, every cycle

12 cycles1 committees7 contributing committees344 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2022

DEM · primary contest (5 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Lipinski, Daniel William William (this candidate) incumbent 227
Aguirre, Juan Enrique challenger 1
Chehade, Iymen challenger
Ramirez, Delia challenger 81
Villegas, Gilbert challenger 17

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Burau, Justin challenger 1

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

WESTERN SPRINGS, IL, 60558

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 73% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 27% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs769$1,077,288
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)1522$390,340
Super PACs2$5,000
Party committees1$7
Total (committee-sourced)$1,472,635

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

3% by dollars

156 of 6769 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 80% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 20%

6769 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 2294 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($5,938,492 vs $1,472,635). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · HURCKES, JEROME

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Dan Lipinski For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $4,150 5 2022
For Our Republic'S Traditions Fund Aka Fort Fund $1,000 1 2022
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) $-3,000 1 2022
American Petroleum Institute Political Action Committee (Api Pac) $2,500 1 2022
National Pro-Life Alliance Pac $500 1 2022
International Warehouse Logistics Association Pac $-1,000 1 2022
Clark Street Associates Llc Pac $1,500 1 2022

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

45% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2022) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 5 of 11 contributions · 73% of dollars ($4,150).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$4,150

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

35 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Southwest Airlines Co. Political Action Committee (Swapac) 49% / 51%
American Road & Transportation Builders Association Pac 52% / 48%
Exelon Corporation Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
General Electric Company Aerospace Employee Political Action Committee (Ge Aerospace Pac) 46% / 54%
Norfolk Southern Corporation Good Government Fund 46% / 54%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%
Oracle America, Inc. Political Action Committee (Oracle Pac) 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2022 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $11,598 54
Breaker Press Co., Inc. $485,745 41
Breaker Press Co., Inc. $256,328 26
Eftps $21,851 26
Chase Card Service $166,460 24
Bonomo, Joe $10,125 24
6537 Archer $12,000 23
Kenny & Kenny, Pc $17,018 22
At&T $1,593 21
Ford Credit $9,057 20
Merchant Bank Card $851 18
Ace Hardware $2,212 18

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..